Would You Prefer XAI's Grok Vs ChatGPT? An Evaluation

Grok AI better than ChatGPT due to its ability to provide more up-to-date and pertinent information.

Places where the data was collected:

Data retrieved in real-time from the X platform by Grok AI

Introducing ChatGPT: A vast and varied dataset

Time available:

Grok AI: Very small beta test

ChatGPT: Publicly accessible

Positive points:

Grok AI: Real-time information, intuitive replies

ChatGPT: Large dataset, capacity to develop new text formats

Weaknesses:

Grok AI: Limited availability, unproven

ChatGPT: Lack of real-time information, potential for bias

Pricing:

Grok AI: The GPT-3.5 model used in the free version of ChatGPT was trained up to September 2022, meaning it can only deliver correct information up to that date. Technically, the same is true for GPT-4, but it specializes at learning and responding to current facts when prompted using ChatGPT.

ChatGPT: The beta version of Grok is presently accessible to a restricted number of users in the US. Soon, it will become available to X Premium+ members, priced at $17 per month, making it more expensive than ChatGPT+.

Read Also : What Is Grok AI On Twitter, And How Does It Relate To Recent AI Developments?

Grok Vs. ChatGPT: The superior AI Chatbot

Grok-1 demonstrates extraordinary capabilities as it scores 63.2% on the HumanEval coding task and 73% on MMLU. While it may not reach GPT-4, xAI says that Grok-1 has greatly improved over Grok-0 in a reasonably short time.

On the GSM8k benchmark, which particularly assesses middle-class math word problems, Grok-1 gains 62.9%, outperforming GPT-3.5 and LLaMa 2, albeit falling behind Palm 2, Claude 2, and GPT-4.

Grok-1 scores strongly across numerous benchmarks like MMLU, HumanEval, a Python code generation test, and MATHS, which covers middle and high school arithmetic exams.

In a humanly graded test, Grok-1 earned 59% in the 2023 Hungarian national high school mathematics finals, exceeding Claude 2’s 55% but falling short of GPT-4’s 68%.

These results imply that Grok-1 is more capable than OpenAI’s GPT-3.5 but less advanced than the current GPT-4. xAI believes that Grok-1, although requiring less training data, can compete effectively with models that demand larger datasets and greater processing resources.

Conclusion:

Grok AI bot emerges as a robust and novel conversational AI solution. Its ability to compete effectively with OpenAI’s ChatGPT models like GPT-3.5 and GPT-4, requiring larger datasets and greater processing power, signals its potential for future growth and advancement. The competition between Grok and ChatGPT promises to promote breakthroughs in conversational AI, ultimately benefiting consumers with more capable and responsive chatbots. 

Read More: How Does The New Image Generation Feature In Elon Musk's XAI Grok 2 Chatbot Improve Its Functionality?

I believe that once someone works out how to build a specific computational model for AI, it will be quite simple for others to do the same. From there, which one is "the best" is usually determined by how much they are willing to invest in ongoing R&D, as this determines the size of their supporting infrastructure and the type of talent they can attract to make minor improvements to the code and the various training sets. That is simply the nature of how intellectual property rules apply to algorithms.

What you do not typically notice is a big change in the character of that model.

I am confident that Elon's LLM chatbot will prove to be an excellent example of an LLM chatbot. I do not anticipate it to do much more than ChatGPT has already done. Given the current status of the sector, it appears to be an exercise in corporate vanity. Everyone is scrambling to create their own version of ChatGPT, not because they believe they can currently provide something new, but because they are afraid that not having one will result in them being publicly regarded as falling behind a competitor. And it is far too early to predict which, if any, of these projects will receive the long-term funding required to achieve the next great breakthrough.

As tech guru Elon Musk's xAI presents Grok, a chatbot ready to challenge OpenAI's ChatGPT, the always growing field of artificial intelligence welcomes a fresh competitor. Still in beta phase, Grok's unique qualities and powers have created waves already. In this paper, we investigate the five main variations between Grok and ChatGPT, thereby clarifying what distinguishes these AI-powered chatbots in the competitive environment of conversational artificial intelligence in 2024.

As internet entrepreneur Elon Musk's xAI presents Grok, a chatbot ready to challenge OpenAI's ChatGPT, the always growing field of artificial intelligence receives a new competitor. Still in beta phase, Grok's unique qualities and powers have created waves already. In this paper, we investigate the five main distinctions between Grok and ChatGPT, thereby clarifying what distinguishes these AI-powered chatbots in the competitive scene of conversational artificial intelligence in 2024.

1. Purpose

Grok is built on Grok-1, a 33 billion parameter strong language model (LLM) developed by xAI. By comparison, ChatGPT is built on GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) architecture developed by OpenAI. xAI claims that Grok's main goal in development is to help individuals grasp and learn. Designed over four months, Grok-1 LLM is the basis of this creative artificial intelligence chatbot.

2. Capabilities

On the HumanEval coding task, Grok-1 scores 63.2% and on the Mathematics Middle-Level Understanding (MMLU) exam, 73%. Comparatively to Grok-0, xAI has remarkably raised Grok-1's performance in a somewhat short period. Grok-1 still lacks the ability of more advanced models such as GPT-4, nevertheless.

3. Hand-Graded Evaluation

xAI hand-graded Grok-1, and with a C grade (59%), it passed the 2023 Hungarian national high school finals in mathematics. Although it falls rather short of GPT-4's B grade (68%), this mark exceeds Claude 2's 55%. Though it currently trails behind the most recent model, Grok-1 appears already more powerful than OpenAI's GPT-3.5 based on these results.

4. Pricing

Regarding price, Grok and ChatGPT differ rather noticeably. Two ChatGPT versions from OpenAI—a basic free version and a $20 monthly subscription version—offer real-time access and improved capability. Grok, on the other hand, presents a reasonable price range; its premium model runs $16 a month. When users decide between the two platforms, this pricing difference could affect their choice.

5. Approachability

Grok and ChatGPT differ greatly mostly in their accessibility to these platforms. Following the beta testing phase Grok provides premium access to all X (previously known as Twitter) premium subscribers. Premium X members will thus get access to the AI chatbot in line with its testing stage. Grok also gives flawless user experience by giving real-time access to the X platform.

The always growing field of artificial intelligence welcomes a fresh adversary as internet entrepreneur Elon Musk's xAI presents Grok, a chatbot ready to challenge OpenAI's ChatGPT. Still in beta phase, Grok's unique qualities and powers have created waves already. In this paper, we investigate the five main distinctions between Grok and ChatGPT, thereby clarifying what distinguishes these AI-powered chatbots in the competitive scene of conversational artificial intelligence in 2024.

It is a late entry into an already saturated market.

It offers no value proposition.

If you want the best, most powerful model, GPT4 is still the choice.
If you want an open-source option, Llama2 remains the best.
If he had released it before Meta as a "open source" alternative to GPT models a few months ago, it could have had a chance, but it is definitely too late.

We will see what he has planned for it. Right now, it appears to be a Twitter search engine and a tool to encourage people to subscribe to Twitter Premium.