Named for a Georgia nursing understudy who was killed and whose name turned into an energizing cry during his White House crusade, President Donald Trump marked the main proportion of his new government on Wednesday.
Trump offered thanks for the bipartisan sponsorship of his most memorable bill since getting down to business on January 20.
Unapproved workers who are accused of vicious offenses and burglary should be confined under the Laken Riley Act. In both the House and the Senate, the bill had bipartisan help. Sen. John Fetterman, a leftist from Pennsylvania, was available at the White House on Wednesday to sign the law.
The following information relates to the Laken Riley Act:
Who was Laken Riley?
On February 22, 2024, Riley, at 22 years old, went for a run while attending Augusta University College of Nursing. Jose Antonio Ibarra allegedly came upon her and killed her during a scuffle, according to the prosecution. A judge heard the case alone and convicted Ibarra guilty of murder and other offenses in November after he gave up his right to a jury trial. Life without parole was the penalty imposed against him.
Because Ibarra had been apprehended for illegal entrance in September 2022 near El Paso, Texas, amid a major spike of migration, and then allowed to pursue his case in immigration court, Trump and other Republicans blamed former President Joe Biden for her death.
Rep. Mike Collins, a Republican from Georgia, stated that he would never have had the chance to murder her if this measure had been the law.
During his State of the Union speech last year, Biden brought up Riley when discussing border security. This came after U.S. Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene yelled at him, "Say her name!"
Must Read: Why Arsenal's struggles show you shouldn't count out Donald Trump?
What does the bill do?
According to the new rule, any migrant who is caught or charged with a crime like as stealing, attacking a police officer, or causing harm or death must be detained by federal authorities.
Sen. Katie Britt, R-Ala., who supported the measure in the Senate, stated, "If you enter this country illegally and commit a crime, you should not be allowed to roam the streets of this country."
Additionally, the law gives state attorneys general the authority to bring legal action against the federal government for damages resulting from immigration enforcement decisions or failures that negatively impact states or individuals. This includes not holding migrants who have been given deportation orders or releasing them from custody.
During the Trump and Biden administrations, states have been attempting to challenge presidential decisions, and this clause provides them some authority to decide immigration policy.
Why were the majority of Democrats against it?
Some have expressed worry that the law will deny migrants—including children and Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals recipients—their access to due process.
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, a Democrat from New York, stated, "We are witnessing a fundamental erosion of our civil rights in the wake of tragedy." "Under this bill, a person would be rounded up, placed in a private detention camp, and sent out for deportation without a day in court if they are even remotely suspected of committing a crime, such as shoplifting."
Why were some Democrats in favor of it?
The majority of the Democrats who backed it came from five competitive states, and they said that their people wanted increased border security and were in favor of deporting criminally charged migrants.
Everyone who breaks the law ought to be held responsible. Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto, D-Nev., posted on social media following the passing of the Laken Riley Act, saying, "That's why I voted to pass it.
Democratic Senators from New Hampshire. The bill was also backed by Virginia Senator Mark Warner, Jeanne Shaheen, and Maggie Hassan. Next year, Warner and Shaheen are both running for a fourth term.
Berglunds snabbköp
No comments